Reasonable Noise in Shared Living Environments
In Farinha v. White, the Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT) addressed a common issue in condominiums: noise complaints between neighbours. This
Our client-focused approach enables a clear path to a positive outcome.
We are a boutique condominium and joint property law firm serving condominium corporations throughout Eastern Ontario. Our dedication to the practice, our clients and our community is what sets us apart.
We focus on condominiums and other forms of shared property. There are many unique principles and issues that apply to such properties. We understand the issues and we can provide the answers.
Our client service also sets us apart. We know that legal issues are often urgent. Our commitment is to offer prompt service that will hopefully ease some burden and achieve strong results for our clients.
We come nimble and prepared in our areas of specialty. We work as a team, with extensive experience and expertise that we all share together. Our clients don’t pay for training about condominium and shared property law.
We consider it an honour and a privilege any time someone chooses us as their legal counsel. We truly enjoy the wonderful relationships that we have with our clients. We’d love to work with you.
As condominium law specialists representing over 1000 condominium corporations, our suite of services represent our expertise in the field.
Updated continuously by our team, we have the finger on the pulse for everything regarding condominium law.
In Farinha v. White, the Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT) addressed a common issue in condominiums: noise complaints between neighbours. This
Condominium owners sometimes assert that “the condominium corporation is responsible for my standard unit”, but that is not what standard units are all about. Repair responsibility is determined by the Condominium Act and by the Declaration. In most cases, the standard unit description doesn’t impact the repair responsibility.
The recent ruling by the Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT) in Peel Condominium Corporation No. 94 v. Cooper highlights the enforcement of condominium rules and pet owner responsibilities. The Tribunal upheld the Board’s decision, affirming that pet owner’s persistent non-compliance with pet regulations rendered her dog a nuisance.
In three recent cases, the Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT) held that noise from (i) improper use of gym equipment, (ii) a parking garage door, and (iii) yelling, shouting, jumping, banging, and slamming doors constituted unreasonable noise and nuisance.
In a recent case, the Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT) ruled against a condominium corporation’s proposed condition that an owner’s service animal should be required to wear an identifying vest. We’re concerned about this decision.
In a recent case, the Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT) found that a tenant was causing unreasonable noise and that the landlord had failed to take reasonable steps to obtain the tenant’s compliance. The CAT also found that the condominium corporation had not violated the tenant’s human rights under the Ontario Human Rights Code.
Stay in the loop with all the latest condo law news.
Keep informed by following our social media accounts.
Interested in our services? Reach out today.